评价来源与有限定的论证练习单 · 九年级
评价来源与有限定的论证：写有限定的论证评价前，检查来源目的、证据相关性和充分性。初始包含8项练习。附答案或作答指导。支持Letter/A4打印，或在打印窗口保存PDF。
同一目标和支持级别共有 3 个不同题组，每个题组的材料与答案保持对应。 在浏览器打印窗口中选择“另存为 PDF”即可保存副本。
页面布局
0 页练习 · 0 页答案。需要时会自动增加页面，题目与答案保持对应。
继续此学习序列
单元目标与教学指南 →独立活动 · 关于 40 分钟 · 铅笔
练习题组 1 / 3. 每个题组保持相同的学习目标和任务结构。
评价来源与有限定的论证
评价来源与有限定的论证
安静自习时段
虚构的练习数据或情境，并非真实研究报告。
Document A — Student proposal: Our school should try a quiet study hour twice a week. In a fictional survey of 30 volunteers, 22 said they wanted a place to work after class. The proposal says a staffed room could help these students begin assignments before going home. It suggests a six-week trial rather than a permanent change.
Document B — Office note: The room is available on Tuesday and Thursday, when a late bus already runs. Staffing still needs approval, and students who do not use that bus may have other transport needs. The survey did not ask how often respondents would attend. A trial should record actual attendance, staffing time and feedback from both users and nonusers before the school decides whether to continue.
示例：宣传单和时间表可以讨论同一活动，却不一定独立证实活动成功。应检查各来源实际测量什么、如何收集，以及结论是否符合证据。 根据材料完成各项任务，按要求作答。
1.比较文档 A 和 B 的目的。 Compare the purpose of Document A with the purpose of Document B.
2.实际观察或报告了什么？哪些更强的结果没有被证实？ What is actually observed or reported? What stronger outcome is not established?
3.指出两个有助于判断相关性或可靠性、但缺失的方法细节，解释其重要性。 Identify two missing method details that would help judge relevance or reliability. Explain their importance.
4.B 独立核实了 A 的数字结果吗？解释 B 增加了什么、没有增加什么。 Does Document B independently verify Document A’s numerical result? Explain what B does and does not add.
5.根据两份文档提出论点，不承诺它们未测量的结果。 Write a thesis that uses both documents without promising an outcome they do not measure.
6.写2至3段方案评价，注明证据来自 A 或 B，评价相关性和充分性，并说明未知部分。 Write a 2–3 paragraph evaluation of the proposal. Attribute evidence to A and B, assess its relevance and sufficiency, and state what remains unknown.
7.说明下一步收集什么证据、如何定义结果，以及仍存在的一项限制。 Describe what evidence you would collect next, how you would define the outcome and one limitation that would remain.
8.修改一句把建议当成已核实结果的话，并解释两者的区别。 Revise one sentence that treats a recommendation as a verified result. Explain the distinction.
评价来源与有限定的论证
开放题提供评分要点和参考回答。有充分依据的其他回答也可接受。
评价来源与有限定的论证
安静自习时段
虚构的练习数据或情境，并非真实研究报告。
Document A — Student proposal: Our school should try a quiet study hour twice a week. In a fictional survey of 30 volunteers, 22 said they wanted a place to work after class. The proposal says a staffed room could help these students begin assignments before going home. It suggests a six-week trial rather than a permanent change.
Document B — Office note: The room is available on Tuesday and Thursday, when a late bus already runs. Staffing still needs approval, and students who do not use that bus may have other transport needs. The survey did not ask how often respondents would attend. A trial should record actual attendance, staffing time and feedback from both users and nonusers before the school decides whether to continue.
示例：宣传单和时间表可以讨论同一活动，却不一定独立证实活动成功。应检查各来源实际测量什么、如何收集，以及结论是否符合证据。 根据材料完成各项任务，按要求作答。
1.比较文档 A 和 B 的目的。 Compare the purpose of Document A with the purpose of Document B.
- 使用材料中的相关细节，并解释它们之间的联系。
- 回答所有要求的部分；接受有充分依据的其他答案。
一种参考回答： A advocates a six-week quiet study-hour trial. B identifies practical conditions and information needed before a decision.
2.实际观察或报告了什么？哪些更强的结果没有被证实？ What is actually observed or reported? What stronger outcome is not established?
- 保留材料中的事实、顺序和限定条件。
- 结论限定在材料所描述的人群、结果和条件范围内。
一种参考回答： 22 of 30 volunteers wanted a place to work. However, the volunteer preference survey does not establish regular attendance.
3.指出两个有助于判断相关性或可靠性、但缺失的方法细节，解释其重要性。 Identify two missing method details that would help judge relevance or reliability. Explain their importance.
- 使用材料中的相关细节，并解释它们之间的联系。
- 回答所有要求的部分；接受有充分依据的其他答案。
一种参考回答： The selection or observation rules affect who and what the evidence represents. Repeated records or feedback would show whether the result depends on one occasion.
4.B 独立核实了 A 的数字结果吗？解释 B 增加了什么、没有增加什么。 Does Document B independently verify Document A’s numerical result? Explain what B does and does not add.
- 使用材料中的相关细节，并解释它们之间的联系。
- 结论限定在材料所描述的人群、结果和条件范围内。
一种参考回答： B describes staffing and transport and a checking plan. It does not independently repeat or verify the numerical count in A.
5.根据两份文档提出论点，不承诺它们未测量的结果。 Write a thesis that uses both documents without promising an outcome they do not measure.
- 结论限定在材料所描述的人群、结果和条件范围内。
- 回答所有要求的部分；接受有充分依据的其他答案。
一种参考回答： The documents support investigating a six-week quiet study-hour trial while addressing staffing and transport, rather than assuming permanent success.
6.写2至3段方案评价，注明证据来自 A 或 B，评价相关性和充分性，并说明未知部分。 Write a 2–3 paragraph evaluation of the proposal. Attribute evidence to A and B, assess its relevance and sufficiency, and state what remains unknown.
- 使用材料中的相关细节，并解释它们之间的联系。
- 结论限定在材料所描述的人群、结果和条件范围内。
- 写出连贯的完整句子，正确使用大写字母和标点。
- 回答所有要求的部分；接受有充分依据的其他答案。
一种参考回答： Document A gives a reason to consider a six-week quiet study-hour trial: 22 of 30 volunteers wanted a place to work. That evidence is relevant to a potential need, but the volunteer preference survey does not establish regular attendance. It does not establish the permanent outcome. Document B adds conditions concerning staffing and transport. It recommends a way to run on late-bus days and collect actual attendance and staffing data, not an independent confirmation of A’s numbers. Together the documents justify further investigation with clear conditions. The decision should depend on additional evidence about actual use, access and practical cost, rather than on the proposal’s appeal alone.
7.说明下一步收集什么证据、如何定义结果，以及仍存在的一项限制。 Describe what evidence you would collect next, how you would define the outcome and one limitation that would remain.
- 回答所有要求的部分；接受有充分依据的其他答案。
- 结论限定在材料所描述的人群、结果和条件范围内。
一种参考回答： I would run on late-bus days and collect actual attendance and staffing data and define the outcome before collecting results. A short trial would still not show whether the outcome persists over a full year.
8.修改一句把建议当成已核实结果的话，并解释两者的区别。 Revise one sentence that treats a recommendation as a verified result. Explain the distinction.
- 指出具体修改，并说明它如何改善意思或清晰度。
- 保留材料中的事实、顺序和限定条件。
一种参考回答： “B recommends a trial” differs from “B proves the trial succeeds.” A recommendation names a proposed action; it does not report the action’s measured outcome.
关于这份练习
九年级 · 英语语言与读写 · 包含对应答案 · 支持 US Letter 和 A4
在浏览器打印窗口中选择“另存为 PDF”即可保存副本。
教学指南、答案示例与课程参考
开始之前
在适当帮助下阅读材料，讨论陌生词，独立写作前区分原文细节与解读。
如何使用这份练习单
- 从这项任务开始：比较文档 A 和 B 的目的。
- 结合这项任务讨论：指出两个有助于判断相关性或可靠性、但缺失的方法细节，解释其重要性。
- 请学生应用所学：写2至3段方案评价，注明证据来自 A 或 B，评价相关性和充分性，并说明未知部分。
值得讨论的常见错误
只给出标签或宽泛主张，没有解释支持它的材料细节、语言含义或证据限制。
接下来练习什么
继续学习：评价来源与有限定的论证：应用与创作。
虚构的练习数据或情境，并非真实研究报告。
发布于 2026-10-08；更新于 2026-10-08. 阅读编辑政策.
继续练习
评价来源与有限定的论证：应用与创作
安静自习时段
虚构的练习数据或情境，并非真实研究报告。
Document A — Student proposal: Our school should try a quiet study hour twice a week. In a fictional survey of 30 volunteers, 22 said they wanted a place to work after class. The proposal says a staffed room could help these students begin assignments before going home. It suggests a six-week trial rather than a permanent change.
Document B — Office note: The room is available on Tuesday and Thursday, when a late bus already runs. Staffing still needs approval, and students who do not use that bus may have other transport needs. The survey did not ask how often respondents would attend. A trial should record actual attendance, staffing time and feedback from both users and nonusers before the school decides whether to continue.
评价来源与有限定的论证：应用与创作
应用 · 独立完成 · 20 分钟
写有限定的论证评价前，检查来源目的、证据相关性和充分性。 针对应用与创作的练习。可查看对应学习单元的活动顺序和教学指南。
评价来源与有限定的论证：探索与讲解
安静自习时段
虚构的练习数据或情境，并非真实研究报告。
Document A — Student proposal: Our school should try a quiet study hour twice a week. In a fictional survey of 30 volunteers, 22 said they wanted a place to work after class. The proposal says a staffed room could help these students begin assignments before going home. It suggests a six-week trial rather than a permanent change.
Document B — Office note: The room is available on Tuesday and Thursday, when a late bus already runs. Staffing still needs approval, and students who do not use that bus may have other transport needs. The survey did not ask how often respondents would attend. A trial should record actual attendance, staffing time and feedback from both users and nonusers before the school decides whether to continue.
评价来源与有限定的论证：探索与讲解
探索 · 独立完成 · 10 分钟
写有限定的论证评价前，检查来源目的、证据相关性和充分性。 针对探索与讲解的练习。可查看对应学习单元的活动顺序和教学指南。
修辞诉求与支持：社团阅读
修辞诉求与支持：社团阅读
Ari paints a bright sign for the club door. From the far end of the hall, the letters look like one dark stripe. Ari feels disappointed, then asks a partner to test a larger version. Together they remove extra words and make the main message readable. The finished sign has less decoration, but visitors can find the room. A proposal concludes: “Remember Ari’s effort; care for our shared space. Our experience suggests that a short checklist may help, though we have not compared it with other methods.”
使用所给情境与模型，按题目要求展示计算或解释证据。
1.指出诉诸共同价值或情感的措辞。 Identify wording that appeals to shared values or emotion.
修辞诉求与支持：社团阅读
练习 · 独立完成 · 30 分钟
修辞诉求与支持：社团阅读。9年级可打印练习：通过分析证据、措辞与局限支持有保留的解读。包含五项任务、对应答案与教师指导。支持Letter或A4打印，也可在打印窗口另存PDF。