Skip to content
← All learning units

ela · Grade 9

Rhetorical Analysis: Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Persuasive Discourse

Deconstruct classical Aristotelian rhetorical appeals in historical speeches and analyze how speakers establish credibility, logic, and emotion.

Find this activity in the Language Arts map

Explore the knowledge outline and its source scope. This unit supports selected ideas.

Learning goals

  • Differentiate among ethos (ethical authority), pathos (emotional appeal), and logos (logical reasoning and empirical evidence)
  • Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of rhetorical strategies in shaping audience perception and policy debates

Before you begin

Distinguish a claim from the evidence or appeal supporting it.

Age and grade do not measure readiness. Adjust reading or adult support to preserve the intended learning goal.

Follow the sequence

1. Practice

Rhetorical Analysis: Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Persuasive Discourse: first student practice pagePractice preview
Grade 9
RI.9-10.6 Key

Rhetorical Analysis: Ethos, Pathos & Logos in Persuasive Discourse

Practice · Independent · 15 min

Deconstruct classical Aristotelian rhetorical appeals in historical speeches and analyze how speakers establish credibility, logic, and emotion.

Shuffle this practice

Teaching and response guide

  1. Model the target skill: differentiate among ethos (ethical authority), pathos (emotional appeal), and logos (logical reasoning and empirical evidence). Use the first task as a guided example before asking for an independent response.
  2. Check readiness first: Distinguish a claim from the evidence or appeal supporting it.
  3. Discuss an incorrect response using this distinction: A speaker's claimed credentials are an appeal to credibility, not independent proof that a conclusion is correct.

Watch for: A speaker's claimed credentials are an appeal to credibility, not independent proof that a conclusion is correct.

Check the answer criteria for each task. A supported explanation may have more than one acceptable response. These activities offer evidence to discuss; completing a sheet alone does not establish mastery.

Possible next goals

Choose the next unit when its prerequisites fit your learner.